The American Veteran's #1 Information Source
                                                   Click here to make VA Watchdog dot Org your homepage

                      VA NEWS FLASH
from Larry Scott at VA Watchdog dot Org -- 09-11-2009
 


  click above for details


 
 


Military Medical Malpractice
Legal Network
     
 

 



VA Watchdog Stuff...
cups, hats, shirts...
click on item to order
and support the site.

 




Be sure to get all four
VA Watchdog dot Org
RSS feeds --
Daily VA
News Flashes
House CVA
Veterans' News

Senate CVA
Veterans' News

VA Press
Releases
 

 


Download your
free copy of the
2009 VA benefits
handbook here...

 

 

Printer-Friendly Version




----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

              Comment at bottom of page.

 

Kurt Priessman

 

THE VA: TEAR IT DOWN BRICK BY BRICK -- PART 2

The second installment of Kurt Priessman's series asks the question: "Is it a Vision Gone Blind?"

 

Editor's Note from Larry Scott, VA Watchdog dot Org ... It's time for this series to be written.  I do not agree with all of Kurt's ideas about the VA, but, as a former government employee with many years of service, Kurt knows the system inside-out.  The proposals in his commentaries should be open to discussion.  You may comment at the bottom of the page.  Kurt's bio and archive of articles can be found here.

-------------------------

THE VA: TEAR IT DOWN BRICK BY BRICK -- PART 2

Is it a Vision Gone Blind?

by Kurt Priessman



The vision is noble, but the actions of the Department appear to say something else. The article asks if overall perceptions of veterans have begun to change.

“To provide veterans the world-class benefits and services they have earned – and to do so by adhering to the highest standards of compassion, commitment, excellence, professionalism, integrity, accountability, and stewardship.” This is the vision of the Department of Veterans Affairs.

With nearly weekly scandals, missed deadlines, and government reports detailing failure after failure, how well are they meeting their vision? Is the vision changing too fast for the antiquated bureaucracy of World War I? Or has the Department’s vision become corrupted by halls filled with those who haven’t served, know little about running hospitals, finances, IT systems, benefits, and quality assurance programs, but do know how to play politics? Have top-level executives who are veterans forgotten their brothers and sisters, both past and present?

Have they turned hospitals into healthcare centers run by administrators at every level who tell doctors and healthcare providers how to practice medicine? Have administrators changed healthcare by denying needed diagnostic tests, in-house and contract referrals for specialists, therapy, and new drugs because of costs? If the answer is yes, which costs? Is it the escalating cost of healthcare, or is it the cost of disability compensation and pension costs, or both?

Let us think for a second. Veteran Service Organizations have stressed increased funding for healthcare for years. Could they be wrong? What if administrators have been told to keep disability compensation and pensions fixed? They could do that by delay and denial only if medical records do not reflect a compensable disability or cause of death.

Therefore, by denying physicians’ diagnostic tests and referrals to specialists they achieve their goals. Adjudicators cannot award when there is no diagnosis, and physicians cannot diagnose without confirmation through tests and consultation with specialists both of which may be quite expensive. Instead, physicians are routinely inundated with patients, can spend only minimal time with them, and have almost no time for documentation of the veterans concerns.



Then when a Compensation and Pension examiner reviews the record, what do they see? No history of concerns, no test results, or specialist confirmation of a service connected diagnosis, leaving only one course of action. Denial through the dreaded phrase “it is less likely than not”.

Have you ever heard of a more win/win situation for the Department? While controlling disability compensation they control healthcare costs. A more ideal outcome cannot be found, leading to the conclusion that administrative denials of care have become part of the compensation denial model. The same applies for therapy and treatment; it mostly boils down to treating the symptoms through medication rather than curing the patient of their ills.

What is worse, the U.S. Government offers medical students loan assistance with the massive tuition needed for medical school and specialty training, but not without strings. Those strings are offering positions with the Public Health Service (CDC, NIH, Indian Health Service, and many other agencies), Bureau of Prisons, DOD, DHS, and the Department of Veterans Affairs for an agreed number of years to pay back loans.

It also keeps healthcare providers on by offering a Physician/Dentist, GS-15, Step 5 - $109,411 in base salary, a Pharmacist, GS-14 Step 5 - $116,829, and a Registered Nurse, Nurse IV, Step 5 - $92,512 for a day shift. This doesn’t count different special pay components which pay up to $45,000 for a Chief Medical Director, $25,000 for longevity of twelve years and more, $2,000 a year for board certification, and up to $40,000 a year bonus for hard to find medical specialties.

This total means that when a hard to fill medical specialty signs with the VHA he/she could make $325,000 and still make additional dependent on his/her position in the VHA. Add health benefits and a retirement system. This includes nurses, medical records administration (certified), x-ray technicians, and others who can name their price in the open market.

Ethically, if a husband/wife team makes between $300,000 - $700,000 a year, are paying back their loans, buying a house, etc. it puts them in a peculiarly bad place as far as “rocking the boat”, “whistle-blowing”, or reporting something is amiss with management, especially if that administrator can influence management to terminate or not renew a “certain” contract. Do you believe you could make the morally right decision in those circumstances?

Wait, that is not all. Now let us add some incentive. The VHA then offers you this much for 28 - 32 hours of work a week, no tort liability insurance, and no call (being available on a minute’s notice). That means you can add to your income by working a second job at a hospital or university. Think they will spill the beans? Can you understand now why healthcare providers do not usually get involved, even when they see injustices, sub-standard healthcare, and malpractice going on?

Next, a discussion of adjudicators and decision review officers; do they believe every veteran is a lying scoundrel trying to defraud the taxpayers of America?
 

 

COMING WEDNESDAY 16 SEP 2009, PART 3 -- How did the DVA Stray so Far From Its Mission and Structure?

-------------------------

This article is ©2009 by Kurt Priessman and is provided exclusively to VA Watchdog dot Org.

-------------------------

TOPICS: veterans, veterans' benefits, VA, Department of Veterans' Affairs, Kurt Priessman, THE VA: TEAR IT DOWN BRICK BY BRICK

-------------------------
posted by
Larry Scott
Founder and Editor
VA Watchdog dot Org

-------------------------

Post your comment on this story using Intense Debate .....

 

-------------------------

Don't forget to read all of today's VA News Flashes (click here)
Click here to make VA Watchdog dot Org your homepage
(go back to VA Watchdog dot Org Home Page)

  

 

 


VA Watchdog Stuff...
cups, hats, shirts...
click on item to order
and support the site.


 

   
Google
 
Web www.vawatchdog.org


FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such materials available in an effort to advance understanding of veterans' issues. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed an interest in receiving the included information for educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml   If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.