| NO COLA IN 2010
MEANS MANY WILL HAVE TO SCRIMP
The money isn't the biggest issue,
some say. It's the message the government is sending about caring.
NOTE
from Larry Scott, VA Watchdog dot Org ... Although this
article is about seniors living on Social Security, it applies as
well to veterans living on VA disability compensation.
Our latest articles explaining
how we got to this point are below ...
http://www.vawatchdog.org/09/nf09/nfoct09/nf101609-1.htm
http://www.vawatchdog.org/09/nf09/nfoct09/nf101509-4.htm
http://www.vawatchdog.org/09/nf09/nfsep09/nf091709-3.htm
-------------------------
Social Security
freeze means seniors must scrimp
By MATT SEDENSKY (AP)
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5g
gKG3Fn-jfJj1S7Qs1VXh9bq2WSQD9BC35C00
PEMBROKE PINES, Fla. — If her check were bigger, 76-year-old Agnes
Conti might be able to spring for a better cut of meat for her pot
roast. She could afford to send her nine grandchildren more than
$20 for their
birthdays
and Christmas. She'd be able to spring for some nice new clothes,
like she sees on QVC, not what she settles for at Walmart.
If only. The government has said the Social Security checks Conti
and tens of millions of other seniors rely on as their primary
source of income will not increase next year as consumer prices
have fallen overall. And while the retired hospital clerk will get
by, she'll be watching her spending even closer, knowing she can't
expect the annual raise she's been accustomed to.
"We were good citizens all our lives. We went to work, we lived by
the book, we weren't on welfare, we didn't ask the city for
anything," Conti said while taking a break from crafts at a senior
center here. "And what do we get?"
At the Southwest Focal Point Senior Center in this Fort Lauderdale
suburb, seniors lamented the cost-of-living freeze, praised a
White House plan for $250 checks to soften the blow, but took all
of the news in stride, saying they've had a lifetime of experience
living on a fixed income and would manage with the money they
currently receive.
Frank Ferreira sits in the center's lobby, near a decorative
fireplace and an autumn centerpiece. The 90-year-old retired truck
driver loves to sing, even practicing on a karaoke machine at
home, and loves to dance even more. He gets about $890 a month
from Social Security, most of which he hands over to his daughter
to help pay his share of the bills.
The money isn't the biggest issue, Ferreira said. It's the message
the government is sending about caring for seniors.

"I could use a little more, but that's all right, I get along," he
said. "But I think that we deserve it, the elderly. You can't just
discard them. You've got to help them."
Nearby, 89-year-old Miriam Danzinger is shuffling along with a
walker. She gets about $1,300 monthly in Social Security, and
after rent and other expenses, including a MediGap plan, she has
little to spare. Her daughter helps pay her bills.
When her Chevrolet Cavalier broke down a few months back,
Danzinger was forced to give it up. When she goes to the store,
she's thrifty, having learned how to cut grocery costs when she
ran a coffee shop. She lives as simply as possible.
"Listen, there's no money. People are going hungry," she said.
"But what can I say? I'm only a little ant."
The freeze in next year's checks is the first since automatic
Social Security cost-of-living increases were adopted in 1975, and
follows a 5.8 percent increase in January, the largest since 1982.
By law, the adjustments are pegged to inflation, which is negative
this year because of lower energy costs.
The Obama administration plan to send $250 stimulus payments to
about 57 million seniors, veterans, retired railroad workers and
people with disabilities, would amount to a roughly 2 percent
raise for the average Social Security recipient. If approved, the
checks would cost about $13 billion, though there is no plan yet
how to finance them.
While seniors here have grown used to the annual raises, many of
them said they're willing to cut the government some slack given
the recession and the federal deficit.
"When they have the money, they give us the raise. If they don't
have it, they don't have it," said Lucy Polieto, a retired
waitress who lives in Southwest Ranches. She wears a glittery gold
sweater and chains around her neck, and walks with a spry bounce
that belies her 94 years. "Sometimes, I'm so surprised when I look
at the check and I get a raise."
The news this week that checks would be stagnant is buffered by
some positives: Seniors won't be getting any less than they
already do, most recipients' Medicare part B premiums will freeze
as well, and the president's plan could soften the blow. But
because the stimulus payments would be a one-time check, not a
raise that would continue over their lifetime, for many seniors it
means thousands of dollars, compounded, that they'll never see.
For those in poverty, the raise could have made a huge difference.
But for the average senior simply living on a fixed income, it is
seen less in dollars and cents, and more in the tangible costs
they might be more careful with.
Polieto cooks eggplant, chicken cacciatori and pasta fazool. A
raise could have given her more leeway with her grocery bill.
"Then I could buy some steaks, maybe," she said. "But I'd rather
have a pork chop."
-------------------------
TOPICS:
veterans, veterans' benefits, VA, Department of Veterans' Affairs,
COLA |