The Nation's #1 Independent Veterans Web Site
                                                   Click here to make VA Watchdog dot Org your homepage


                  VA NEWS FLASH
from Larry Scott at VA Watchdog dot Org -- 05-07-2008 #1
 






 


 
 

 


 



VA Watchdog Stuff...
cups, hats, shirts...
click on item to order
and support the site.






Be sure to get all four
VA Watchdog dot Org
RSS feeds --
Daily VA
News Flashes
House CVA
Veterans' News

Senate CVA
Veterans' News

VA Press
Releases
 

 


Download your
free copy of the
2008 VA benefits
handbook here...

 

 

 

Printer-Friendly Version





SECURITY CLEARANCE DECEPTION
by Larry Scott -- Pentagon's

new policy leads troops to believe that mental health issues

will have no bearing on getting a security clearance.

Nothing could be further from the truth.

 

 

For background on this issue...click here...
http://www.vawatchdog.org/08/nf08/nfMAY08/nf050208-1.htm

Story below:

 

-------------------------

Security Clearance Deception

Pentagon’s new policy leads troops to believe that mental health issues will have no bearing on getting a security clearance. Nothing could be further from the truth.

by Larry Scott



Any service member who has ever had to apply for a security clearance has been handed the Standard Form 86, Questionnaire for National Security Positions. SF-86 is 13-pages long and very personal. It contains questions about the applicant, spouse, family, friends, employers, alcohol use, drug use, credit history, travel outside the country and much, much more.

For years, the one question that many objected to was number 21: “In the last 7 years, have you consulted with a mental health professional (psychiatrist, psychologist, counselor, etc.) or have you consulted with another health care provider about a mental health related condition?...If you answered ‘Yes,’ provide the dates of treatment and the name and address of the therapist or doctor below, unless the consultation(s) involved only marital, family, or grief counseling, not related to violence by you.”

Article continues below:

 

The main objection was that if the answer was “Yes,” then it was felt that would mean “No” to a security clearance. Service members who had seen combat and sought treatment for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) felt the question was discriminatory because they were encouraged by the military to seek treatment and then had to report it. Mental health professionals felt that service members, knowing they would have to answer the question truthfully, were avoiding treatment for fear of not get a clearance.

So, on April 18 of this year, the Department of Defense (DoD) did away with question 21 in its current form. There was great media fanfare over this policy change. Pentagon talking heads appeared on the TV news shows declaring an “historic day” was at hand and
that DoD was going to eliminate the stigma associated with seeking mental health care. Secretary of Defense Robert Gates held a press conference and announced, “It now is clear to people who answer that question that they can answer ‘No’ if they have sought help to deal with their combat stress in general terms.”

What the Sec Def forgot to say was: No matter what you answer, we will drill down and find out everything about you, including mental health treatment, before we grant a security clearance, if we grant a security clearance.

DoD processes about one million security clearance applications every year. Rebecca Allen, DoD’s Deputy Director of Security, claims less than one percent of applications are denied based solely on mental health issues. Allen said, “There was no reason to be concerned about seeking mental health counseling from a security clearance standpoint. Answering ‘yes’ has never been a sole reason…for denying a security clearance.”

If Allen’s statement is correct, then what is the reason for denial of those with mental health issues? Allen said, “It would be the resulting information that would develop during the adjudication phase that may…result in an unfavorable determination.”

Putting together Allen’s two statements helps us get to the core of this issue. Question 21 has always been irrelevant. It has always been the information gathered during the following investigation and adjudication processes that have determined if a clearance was granted or denied.

What this means is that nothing has changed at DoD, even though they are pulling out all the stops to make us think otherwise. A question has been removed, but the process remains the same. Applicants will still be thoroughly investigated, medical records will be scoured, and if a mental health issue is thought to pose security risks, question 21 or no question 21, then that person will be denied.

What will be investigated? Everything. I recently sat on a veterans’ healthcare panel at Washington State University. The participants from private healthcare sector told of being overwhelmed by active-duty personnel seeking mental health treatment. These service members were paying for care out of their own pocket and hoping that by using the private sector that the military would not find out about the treatment. The consensus among the providers was that this was an exercise in futility because the government’s investigative agencies would pull information from government, public and private databases, and surely learn of the service member’s mental health issues.

Public reaction from the veterans’ service organizations (VSOs) to the question 21 issue has been non-existent. But, behind the scenes there is some grumbling. One highly-placed VSO official told me that DoD was “perpetrating a massive hoax” by encouraging service members to seek mental health care while leading them to believe that mental health issues will have no bearing on getting a security clearance.

A clinical psychologist at a large Department of Veterans’ Affairs (VA) hospital had similar sentiments. Speaking on condition of anonymity, he said, “Troops and veterans with concerns about mental health issues should, definitely, seek treatment. But, for them to believe that the government won’t find out about any problems they may have is just not realistic.” And, speaking about DoD’s new question 21 policy, he added, “Just a public relations campaign. They want to portray the image of a kinder, gentler Pentagon. Ha! Not in my lifetime.”

-------------------------

posted by Larry Scott
Founder and Editor
VA Watchdog dot Org

Don't forget to read all of today's VA News Flashes (click here)

Click here to make VA Watchdog dot Org your homepage

email Larry

Send this page to a friend:    

(go back to VA Watchdog dot Org Home Page)






 

Has Uncle Sam turned his back
on your request
for VA benefits?


Contact LEGAL HELP FOR VETERANS for assistance with the benefits you deserve.
click for more info


 
     

Military Medical Malpractice 
Legal Network
               

 

 



VA Watchdog Stuff...
cups, hats, shirts...
click on item to order
and support the site.








 

 

   
Google
 
Web www.vawatchdog.org


FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such materials available in an effort to advance understanding of veterans' issues. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed an interest in receiving the included information for educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml   If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.