Printer Friendly Page
GREENER PASTURES FOR WEST L.A. VA LAND -- The
388-
acre Westside swath holds profound potential
for L.A., if the
federal agency would stop leasing out pieces of
it.
West L.A. VA facility
For more about the problems on the West L.A. VA
campus, use the VA Watchdog search engine...click here...
http://www.yourvabenefits.org/ses
search.php?q=west+l.a.&op=ph
Story here...
http://www.latimes.com/
news/opinion/editorials/la-ed-vet
erans2sep02,0,6029676.story?co
ll=la-news-comment-editorials
Story below:
-------------------------
Editorial
Greener pastures for VA land
The 388-acre Westside swath holds profound potential for L.A., if the
federal agency would stop leasing out pieces of it.
Los Angeles is chronically short of park space, a civic failure that
generations of leaders have only glancingly addressed. In 1930, the
brilliant but ignored Olmsted-Bartholomew plan envisioned a county where
every resident enjoyed easy access to beaches, vistas, recreation areas
and parks. Today, just 30% or so of Los Angeles' children live within
walking distance of a public place to play, the lowest percentage of any
major American city -- and the city is growing denser all the time.
Los Angeles also is home to thousands of veterans, many homeless,
troubled or injured and ill-served by the same Department of Veterans
Affairs that brought the nation disgraceful conditions at Walter Reed
Army Medical Center. That agency has embarked on a confused strategy for
assisting Southern California's military men and women as well.
Those compelling demands -- for park space and for aid to veterans --
are what make 388 acres on the Westside the subject of intense but quiet
debate. Stretching across the 405 Freeway between Westwood and
Brentwood, the land is federal property, donated in 1888 to be used for
veterans and now home to the West Los Angeles Medical Center, a veterans
hospital. It is one of the last and largest open spaces in the city, and
it holds extraordinary potential -- if its destiny can be wrested from
the VA, which has been leasing pieces of the property for commercial
development to pay for veterans programs. That development has resulted
in treasured land being used for such prosaic purposes as a rental car
lot. It is a program for the dissipation of this important property.
Fortunately, an assemblage of civic and political power is moving to cut
the VA off at the pass. Former Mayor Richard Riordan, billionaire
philanthropist Eli Broad, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), Rep. Henry
A. Waxman (D-Los Angeles) and County Supervisor Zev Yaroslavsky, who has
been working on this issue for years, have found common ground in
support of a ban on the property's development and the creation of a
planning group charged with writing a master plan for the land. Their
efforts deserve broad public and political support.
Waxman took an early lead to protect the property by introducing a bill
in May that would halt its piecemeal development. Feinstein then
attached similar language to a military construction appropriation bill,
which has passed the House and is awaiting Senate action. That bill,
with the Feinstein-Waxman rider, should be passed by the Senate and
signed by President Bush.
Once that is achieved, the coalition eyeing the property begins to
fracture. Broad and Riordan envision a great public park, open to all;
typically, Broad emphasizes the cultural possibilities of such a site,
whereas Riordan leans on its recreational prospects. Waxman and
Yaroslavsky favor a plan more directly focused on the needs of veterans,
along with the construction of a facility to house homeless people.
Feinstein, meanwhile, has yet to commit to a specific direction.
These competing visions have significant political implications. Some
veterans may oppose creating a planning group if they believe it will
take land dedicated to veterans and turn it into public property; some
supporters of the park may lose enthusiasm for the process if it is
confined to a debate over veterans' concerns. But those disagreements
are for tomorrow. For now, the goal is to stop thoughtless and
incremental development of the property.
After the bill is passed and signed, the second step toward imagining
the property's future should be the establishment of a federally
supported master-planning process. A citizens commission -- its members
selected by elected leaders and representatives of the VA-- should be
convened and charged with drafting a comprehensive plan. That plan
should begin with the needs of veterans and -- then and only then --
consider possible supplementary uses.
Time is running out on the property. As more of it is tied up in leases,
it will prove increasingly difficult to make the most of the land. Quick
action, however, will produce a rarity in Los Angeles: the chance for
thoughtful, considered land use and the realistic opportunity to make
the most of a treasured resource.
-------------------------
Larry Scott --
