The Nation's #1 Independent Veterans Web Site
                                                   Click here to make VA Watchdog dot Org your homepage


                  VA NEWS FLASH
from Larry Scott at VA Watchdog dot Org -- 10-06-2007 #1
 







 

Tired of Going Around in Circles with the VA? Not Getting the Benefits You Earned? We Will Fight to Obtain ALL Possible VA Benefits. Admitted to U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans' Claims. Nationwide Practice.

DILLEY LAW FIRM
CALL TOLL-FREE
1-800-460-0111

click for more info

 



 
 

 



VA Watchdog Stuff
cups, hats, shirts
click here to
support the site






Be sure to get all four
VA Watchdog dot Org
RSS feeds --
Daily VA
News Flashes
House CVA
Veterans' News

Senate CVA
Veterans' News

VA Press
Releases

 


Download your
free copy of the
2007 VA benefits
handbook here...

 

 

 



 Bookmark this page: 

 

 

Printer Friendly Page

VA BUDGET AND OTHER SPENDING BILLS: MUCH ACTION

BUT LITTLE PROGRESS -- Republicans began turning up

the heat on Democrats for holding up the Military Construction-

VA bill, which includes veterans' funding.

 

 

For more about the VA budget, use the VA Watchdog search engine...click here...
http://www.yourvabenefits.org/ses
search.php?q=va+budget&op=ph

Story here... http://public.cq.com/
docs/bt/btnews110-000002600237.html

Story below:

-------------------------

CQ BUDGET TRACKER NEWS

Spending Bills: Much Action, Little Progress

By Chuck Conlon and Kerry Young
Budget Tracker Editors



Democrats yesterday said they had taken another step toward moving the first fiscal 2008 spending bills to the president, while rhetoric continued to fly on a number of budget issues.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said, "We solved our 302(b) allocation situation" -- a critical first step before the House and Senate can negotiate compromises on individual spending bills. Although both chambers were using the same topline number for overall discretionary spending, they differed in spending levels for individual bills (the so-called 302(b) allocations). For instance, the House's Labor-HHS-Education bill would provide $1.9 billion more than the Senate version, while the Senate's C-J-S bill would provide $868 million more than the House. Negotiators for individual bills need to know their final allocation in order to determine what program funding trade-offs can be made within the bill. Details on the allocations were not made available, nor was it clear whether allocations had been set for all 12 bills.

Republicans began turning up the heat on Democrats for holding up the Military Construction-VA bill, which includes veterans' funding. Minority Leader Boehner wrote to Speaker Pelosi noting that conferees hadn't been appointed for the popular bill, expressing concern it was being held back to carry other spending bills and urging immediate action. "Adequate funding for health care and housing for our veterans and men and women in uniform is a top priority for Congress, and their needs should take precedence over partisan politics." OMB Director Nussle sounded a similar theme in a letter to appropriators, saying, "Our veterans deserve better. Funding for these critical programs should not be held hostage in an effort to promote a political agenda."

Look for Republicans to continue highlighting the veterans bill. Democrats in recent years effectively battered Republicans over shortages in veterans' funding, and Republicans are ready to return the favor. For their part, Democrats yesterday continued to contrast the costs of the war in Iraq with Bush's opposition to expanding children's health coverage, and proposed spending for education and infrastructure improvements.

The two parties also traded shots regarding fiscal responsibility, with each side releasing dueling reports on the impact of Democratic paygo rules. Democrats highlighted massive deficits incurred during the Bush presidency when tax cuts and new mandatory spending were enacted without being offset, and they heralded the Democratic paygo rules created this year that strictly require offsets. In their report, released at a press conference by Speaker Pelosi, Democrats said they had "restored fiscal discipline," noting that every bill passed by the House this year had complied with paygo, including 30 that required offsets of $1 million or more. Said Pelosi, "Fiscal responsibility is a central principle of the House Democrats."

Republicans countered that most offsets were paid for by "gimmicks, fees or tax increases" -- even while admitting the GOP had used budget gimmicks in the past. In a briefing with reporters, top House GOP budgeteer Ryan said, "Republicans have been guilty of gimmicks in the past, Democrats are guilty of gimmicks in the present," arguing it was different now because of the coming fiscal crisis caused by rapidly growing major entitlements. Ryan said that although each bill technically complied with paygo, Democrats were violating the spirit of the rule and actually "racking up more liabilities for taxpayers" that would cause the nation to go further into debt. Paygo, he said, "is nothing more than a recipe for tax increases."

 

Source: CQ Budget Tracker News
Reporting the deals, dollars and decisions of the federal budget process.

-------------------------

Larry Scott  --

Don't forget to read all of today's VA News Flashes (click here)

Click here to make VA Watchdog dot Org your homepage

email Larry

Send this page to a friend:    

(go back to VA Watchdog dot Org Home Page)







 

Has Uncle Sam turned his back
on your request
for VA benefits?


Contact LEGAL HELP FOR VETERANS for assistance with the benefits you deserve.
click for more info

 

 

 



VA Watchdog Stuff
cups, hats, shirts
click here to
support the site








 

 

   
Google
 
Web www.vawatchdog.org


FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such materials available in an effort to advance understanding of veterans' issues. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed an interest in receiving the included information for educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml   If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.