The nation’s veterans disability system is severely strained and it
could be strained to the point of collapse when 700,000 returning Iraq
and Afghanistan war vets begin applying for help.
It is dismaying then to learn that since Congress generously relaxed the
rules in 1972, veterans, often of only short-term service, are receiving
lifetime benefits of $100 a month or more for sexually transmitted
diseases like gonorrhea, syphilis and genital herpes – even if they
became infected on their own time, decades ago and for conduct that was
often illicit.
Reporter Lisa Hoffman of Scripps Howard News Service found a South
Carolina vet who served from 1955 to 1958 and caught gonorrhea about 10
times during and after his service and 47 years later was awarded $200 a
month for life for gonorrhea-caused arthritis in his knee.
The Department of Veterans Affairs either doesn’t know or won’t say how
many vets are receiving disability benefits for venereal disease but
Hoffman estimates that collectively they have received millions of
dollars – and it’s legal. Close to 20 sexually transmitted or related
conditions are compensable with VA benefits.
Congress loosened restrictions on venereal disease to encourage
returning Vietnam vets to seek treatment but since then, Hoffman writes,
the system “has evolved into a more generous one that does not require
vets with VD or any other medical condition to demonstrate how their
ailment has hurt their earning power in order to receive monthly
checks,” only that their condition began while they were in military
service or was aggravated by it.
Veterans groups argue rightly that the issue of questionable benefits
pales next to the trouble many vets have in getting benefits clearly due
to them. But public confidence in the fairness of the system, the
assurance that the money is going to those who genuinely need it, is
vital to the kind of support the disability system is going to require.
The Veterans Disability Benefits Commission, whose report on disability
reform is due out in September, should consider whether it is fair to
compensate veterans for ailments that, as Hoffman writes, don’t affect
their ability to work, or are treatable, or carry only tangential
connection to military service.
---------------
Larry Scott --
Don't forget to read all of today's VA
News Flashes
(click here)
If
you're military, you need to know VA Joe. Active
military forum and comedy
contests along with updates on VA benefits through the
GI Bill program, all from
Joe -- Sign up today.
Be sure to get all four
VA Watchdog dot Org
RSS feeds --
Daily VA
News Flashes
House CVA
Veterans' News
Senate CVA
Veterans' News
VA Press
Releases
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which
has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are
making such materials available in an effort to advance understanding of veterans' issues. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such
copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright
Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this
site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed an interest
in receiving the included information for educational purposes. For more
information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml If you wish
to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that
go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.