FILIPINOS WHO FOUGHT FOR U.S. DON'T GET
BENEFITS --
They fought at Corregidor and Bataan, with
thousands
walking as prisoners on the infamous Death
March.
Nearing the end of the Bataan Death
March, a thinning line of American and Filipino prisoners of war
carry casualties in improvised stretchers as they approach Camp
O'Donnell, a Japanese POW camp, in April 1942. (AP file photo)
WASHINGTON — While official Washington
scrambles to take care of veterans of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars,
many Filipino veterans who fought in the U.S. Army against the Japanese
in World War II are still seeking full benefits from the U.S.
government.
More than 65 years ago, they fought at Corregidor and Bataan, with
thousands walking as prisoners on the infamous Death March, which the
Philippines will commemorate Monday with a national holiday.
For years after the Philippines fell in 1942, many were part of
organized guerrilla units in the mountainous jungles, battling Japanese
forces and keeping them from being deployed elsewhere in the war.
But shortly after the war ended, Congress stripped thousands of the
Filipino fighters of their eligibility for full veterans' benefits in
the Rescission Acts of 1946, limiting the veterans to compensation for
service-related disabilities or death.
"I was terribly shocked when I was told that my services in World War II
in the U.S. Army forces was, by law, deemed not 'active service for the
purposes of any benefit administered by the ... VA,' " said Franco
Arcebal, 83, who was a guerrilla fighter in the Philippines.
Arcebal of Los Angeles told the House Veterans Affairs Committee in
February that he believed the United States did him an injustice.
"I felt terribly discriminated upon," he said.
Since the 1946 congressional action, Filipino veterans and their
advocates battled in the courts and Congress to win some benefits, such
as health care, internment in national cemeteries and up to $600 in a
burial allowance, but those victories were limited to only some of the
veterans.
"We survived four and half years of battle with guns, but we are now
having a battle of legal minds for the injustice that the U.S.
government has given us," said Art Caleda of Waipahu, Hawaii, a former
intelligence officer with the guerrillas in the Philippines' northern
provinces.
Caleda, 83, and other Filipino veterans — an estimated 20,000 in the
United States and the Philippines out of the more than 200,000 who
fought in the war — are backing legislation again this year to give them
full benefits from the Veterans Affairs Department.
Caleda, who was wounded in 1944 while helping rescue a downed U.S.
pilot, said the aging veterans have pushed the legislation since it was
first introduced in 1992.
"At this point in time, we need very, very much the well-deserved
benefits for the services we have rendered," said Caleda, scheduled to
speak on the issue Wednesday to the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee.
Under current law, many of the Filipino veterans are denied full VA
benefits such as pensions for low-income veterans over 65 — almost
$11,000 a year for single veterans — and survivors' death pension —
about $7,300 for a spouse with no children. Other denied benefits
include some health care, home loans, education benefits, job training
and handicap adjustments for a house or car.
Bills in both the House and Senate would equalize the benefits with
those received by other U.S. veterans.
Rep. Bob Filner, D-Calif., chairman of the House Veterans Affairs
Committee, said most Filipino families today include a World War II
veteran or son or daughter of a veteran.
"Sixty years of injustice burns in the hearts of these veterans," said
Filner, a sponsor of the House Filipino equity bill. "Now in their 80s
and 90s, their last wish is the restoration of the honor and dignity due
them."
Alec S. Petkoff who specializes in veterans affairs for the American
Legion, called the situation "a shame" and a legal unfairness.
"I hope the Senate and House rectify the problem and give the Filipino
veterans the equity that they earned through their service and were
promised," he said.
Patrick Ganio, 86, was part of the Philippines Army in 1941 when
President Franklin Roosevelt signed the executive order drafting them
into the U.S. Army. By December, Ganio was fighting the Japanese on
Bataan and later was on Corregidor when it surrendered in May 1942.
Filipino troops, many not properly equipped or trained, made up the bulk
of U.S. troops in the Philippines when the Japanese began their invasion
on Dec. 8, 1941.
Eventually, Ganio, who now lives in Jacksonville, Fla., linked up with
the guerrillas on Luzon in the Philippines and fought on through the
islands' liberation in 1944.
Ganio, who moved to the United States in 1980 after working as a school
teacher in the Philippines for 30 years, said he and other veterans have
battled for two decades to gain equity with other veterans.
"As we think of the supreme sacrifices we paid for serving under the
American flag, it is shocking and painful ... in our low moments to feel
betrayed from a friend we trust," Ganio said. "This ... is our last cry
for justice."
---------------
Larry Scott --
Don't forget to read all of today's VA
News Flashes
(click here)
If
you're military, you need to know VA Joe. Active
military forum and comedy
contests along with updates on VA benefits through the
GI Bill program, all from
Joe -- Sign up today.
Be sure to get all four
VA Watchdog dot Org
RSS feeds --
Daily VA
News Flashes
House CVA
Veterans' News
Senate CVA
Veterans' News
VA Press
Releases
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which
has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are
making such materials available in an effort to advance understanding of veterans' issues. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such
copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright
Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this
site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed an interest
in receiving the included information for educational purposes. For more
information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml If you wish
to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that
go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.