REMINDERS OF WAR -- "I don't think they really
expected all
these injured people to come back. They've got
paperwork
for all these injured soldiers just stacked
up."
David Thomas, 42, of Sweetwater,
Tenn., above and at left, was a sergeant with the 278th Regimental
Combat Team in Iraq. In August 2005, he was injured in an
anti-tank mine blast and lost his left leg. He still is waiting
for the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs to make a final
determination on his disability status. (Staff Photo by Meghan
Brown)
SWEETWATER, Tenn. -- David Thomas has a left leg made of carbon fiber
and steel, and the composed bearing of a man who has learned to wait.
The 42-year-old father of four waited six months for the Department of
Veterans Affairs to declare him 70 percent disabled, based on the loss
of his leg and damage to his vision during his service in Iraq as a
sergeant with the National Guard's 278th Regimental Combat Team. Now, 19
months after two anti-tank mines exploded beneath the humvee where he
was manning the gunner's turret, he still is waiting for the VA to make
a disability judgment on his dozen other injuries.
"I don't think they really expected all these injured people to come
back (from Iraq)," Mr. Thomas said. "They've got paperwork for all these
injured soldiers just stacked up."
Veterans facilities face rising demand
Veterans advocates push for county help
The U.S. commander of the Veterans of Foreign Wars called the VA's
claims processing system "broken" in testimony in March before a joint
hearing of the House and Senate Veterans Affairs Committees.
Gary Kurpius said the VA has an "unmanageable" backlog of claims. One in
eight is decided wrongly every year, he said.
"It is unacceptable, because each delay and every wrong decision have
real human costs," he said. "No disabled veteran should have to wait for
benefits many of them need to care for themselves and their families."
Mr. Thomas' wife, April, calls the claims process "ridiculous." Her
husband, who spent a year at Walter Reed Army Medical Center in
Washington, D.C., now has to travel all over Tennessee -- from Johnson
City near the Virginia line to Murfreesboro outside Nashville -- to have
his injuries re-examined at VA medical facilities.
"They go through so much treatment and stuff at Walter Reed, and they
have all his medical records -- stacks of them -- and then he comes back
here and has to redo everything," she said.
Mr. Thomas remembers how crowded the hallways were at Walter Reed, how
hard it was to get simple things. The hospital didn't provide him any
clothes to wear during his first few months there -- he finally got one
shirt and one pair of pants from the Red Cross. The system is just
overwhelmed, he said.
So he waits, his claim one of hundreds of thousands bottlenecked in the
VA's benefits system. Donald Samuels, a spokesman for the Tennessee
Department of Veterans Affairs, calls the national backlog of VA
benefits claims "tremendous," estimating it at about 600,000.
"You've got vets out there that have to wait six, seven, eight, nine
months to get a decision on their claim," he said. "Chances are they're
going to lose their house and everything else while they wait for their
claim to be decided."
HIGH DEMAND
The number of claims handled by the Tennessee Department of Veterans
Affairs has increased by about 60 percent each year for the last several
years because of a combination of aging veterans from earlier wars and
younger veterans coming home from Iraq and Afghanistan, Mr. Samuels
said.
In fiscal 2006, the agency handled 84,000 claims. "This year it looks
like it's going to exceed that by quite a bit," Mr. Samuels said.
There are about 540,000 veterans in Tennessee, he said.
In a study of the costs of caring for soldiers returning from war in
Iraq and Afghanistan, Harvard University public policy professor Linda
Bilmes reported the VA had a national backlog of 69,000 pending initial
disability claims in 2000. As of January 2007 there were 400,000, she
reported.
There is no time limit on when a veteran must make a claim for most
disability benefits, and the VA still is handling hundreds of thousands
of new claims from Vietnam veterans, according to her study.
"The current claims process is unable to handle even the current volume
and completely inadequate to cope with the high demand of returning war
veterans," Ms. Bilmes wrote.
In testimony in March before the U.S. House Committee on Veterans
Affairs, the VA's deputy undersecretary for benefits pointed to a
striking growth in demand for benefits.
"The number of veterans filing initial disability compensation claims
and claims for increased benefits has increased every year since 2000,"
Ronald Aument said.
Operations in Iraq and Afghanistan and increased outreach to veterans
are major reasons for the growth in claims, he said. Also, disability
claims have become considerably more complex, with the number of claims
citing eight or more disabilities increasing from 21,814 in 2000 to
51,260 in 2006 -- a 135 percent increase, he said.
"Under the very best of circumstances, it takes about four months to
fully develop a claim," he said.
The VA is hiring to try to move claims more efficiently, he said,
bringing in more than 580 employees during 2006 and adding 400 more by
the end of June. However, it takes two to three years of training to get
those workers "fully productive," he said.
THE LINE OF DUTY
Mr. Thomas came home from Iraq on leave in July 2005 to move his wife
and youngest children -- Maci, 10, and Megan, 6 -- into a three-bedroom
house set on two grassy acres in rural Sweetwater.
Horses graze the land next door, a couple of cats hang around the back
deck, the occasional pickup truck rattles up a gravel driveway to the
neighbor's house at the top of the hill.
"It's quiet here," Mr. Thomas said.
But it would be more than a year before he lived there himself. After
his leave, he'd been back in Iraq 20 days when two anti-tank mines
buried in a dusty road blew apart his humvee and left him with a left
leg that ends 3 inches above the knee. Two of his comrades were killed
that day -- Aug. 22, 2005.
Sgt. Victor Lieurance was 34 and from Seymour, Tenn. Spc. Joseph Hunt
was 27 and from Sweetwater.
Mr. Thomas joined the National Guard in February 2003 knowing he would
be sent to Iraq. On May 14, 2004, he deployed with the 3,700 members of
the 278th for six months of training in Mississippi and California
followed by a year of service in Iraq.
"That's what I jumped in it for," he said. "You'd see all these guys
getting wounded and getting killed, and you just feel worthless."
He'd been in the Army from 1987 to 1990, so he already knew something
about military service. And he's not sorry he went to Iraq. He loves his
country; he did what he thought was right. He would do it again, he
said.
The month before he was injured, he had signed up for six more years in
the Guard.
"I didn't see this coming," he said quietly, resting his right ankle
just above his mechanical left knee. "But I can't complain. My two
friends -- they're gone. I lost two good buddies, and they were good
boys."
His friend Joey Hunt had re-enlisted that month, too.
"He believed the same way I did," Mr. Thomas said. "We believed in what
we were doing."
THE HOME FRONT
April Thomas, 35, was at work when she got the call from her husband's
commanding officer. She walked away from her construction job that day
and would not see another paycheck for 17 months.
She lived for several months at Walter Reed, then spent several more
months taking care of her family and helping her husband travel back and
forth for visits home. While she lived at Walter Reed, the Army paid her
$48 a day for meals and other expenses.
"I just went back to work in January," she said. She drives an hour to
Oak Ridge, Tenn., every day to work construction.
During his year at Walter Reed, Mr. Thomas waited six months for the
Department of Veterans Affairs to make a determination on his disability
claim. The grisly arithmetic of war assigns 60 percent disability for
amputation above the knee. The VA gave Mr. Thomas another 30 percent
disability because of the his loss of vision from the blast.
But his total disability came back at 70 percent, not the 90 percent he
expected.
"Don't ask me how they do their math," he said.
He earned about $4,000 a month while he was in Iraq. The 70 percent
disability ruling meant an income of about $1,600 a month. Eager to get
home to Tennessee and his family, he took it.
"I just wanted to go to my house and live a normal life," he said.
A lump-sum insurance settlement because of the loss of her husband's
limb carried the family for a while, along with his disability payments,
Mrs. Thomas said. But she had to get back to work.
"I made 50 (percent) or 60 percent of our income," she said. "You lose
that much and the bills are based on that, there's no way you can make
it. We wouldn't have been able to make the house payment."
Her husband, who spent nine years making truck parts at a factory in
Sweetwater, has not been able to find a job. He ferries his daughters to
and from school. He catches up on TV shows he missed while he was
deployed.
A friend is trying to help him get a job working dispatch for an area
law enforcement agency. Mr. Thomas said he hopes the job comes through,
though "I'd rather be patrolling."
If he were declared 100 percent disabled, Mr. Thomas would get about
$2,400 a month. He called the VA a couple of weeks ago to check on the
status of his disability claim.
It will be 60 to 90 more days before he hears anything, they told him.
If
you're military, you need to know VA Joe. Active
military forum and comedy
contests along with updates on VA benefits through the
GI Bill program, all from
Joe -- Sign up today.
Be sure to get all four
VA Watchdog dot Org
RSS feeds --
Daily VA
News Flashes
House CVA
Veterans' News
Senate CVA
Veterans' News
VA Press
Releases
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which
has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are
making such materials available in an effort to advance understanding of veterans' issues. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such
copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright
Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this
site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed an interest
in receiving the included information for educational purposes. For more
information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml If you wish
to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that
go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.